Site icon

Urban morphology and urban water demand: a case study in the land constrained Los Angeles region using urban growth modeling

Stephen B Ferencz, Jim Yoon, Johanna Capone and Ryan A McManamay

Acknowledgment of support from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, MultiSector Dynamics, Earth and Environmental System Modeling (MSD) program area.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ada04c

Abstract

The interactions between population growth, urban morphology, and water demand have important implications for water resources and supply in urban regions. Water use for irrigation comprises a significant fraction of urban water demand, and is potentially influenced by long-term changes in urban morphology. To investigate this, we used spatially explicit projections of urban land development intensity (fraction impervious area) generated from a 30 m resolution urban growth model for the Los Angeles (LA) region. Recent historical data on water use and high resolution landcover were used to establish relationships between green area, urban development intensity, and outdoor water demand. These relationships were then used to project outdoor and total water demand in 2100 using the urban growth model outputs. We considered two different population scenarios informed by the shared socioeconomic pathway (SSP) projections for the region (SSP3 and SSP5), and three scenarios of urban development intensification. Our analysis is resolved for over 80 water providers in the region, from the urban core to suburban fringe, and highlights diverse demand responses influenced by initial urban form and water demand attributes. Assumptions about outdoor water use factors based on recent water supply data were found to be nearly as influential on future outdoor demand as the urban growth scenario settings. Compared to previous studies, our work is unique in coherently linking high resolution SSP population scenarios, urban land cover evolution, and urban water demand projections, demonstrating the approach for the LA region—the largest population center in the western United States.

Caption: Mapped provider-level initial urban development intensities defined by the area-weighted LC (a), initial percent outdoor demand (e), and percent increase in population for SSP5 (i). The effect of the different development intensities (low, medium, and high) for SSP5 on urban development intensity (b)–(d), reduction in outdoor demand due to higher development intensities (f)–(h), and the increase in total demand (j)–(l).

Exit mobile version